|
Schumann: Fantasy, Kreisleriana, Papillons,
Fantasiestuecke, Humoreske
Cynthia Raim, piano |
| [Connoisseur CD 4256] |
| |
|
March 2008 |

Every once in awhile, a miraculous musical
event occurs, a perfect congruence of music
and musician. Cynthia Raim's two-disc set of
Schumann solo piano music is such an event. Ms
Raim's playing is so musical, so seductive,
her grasp of Schumann so unerring, that one is
drawn inexorably into its radiant sense of
authenticity. As it happens, I've never been
especially taken with Schumann's music, but
this CD has changed all that. It is among the
few discs I'd select as traveling companions
to that hypothetical desert island, one of the
few I would not want to be without. Other of
my recordings of Schumann's music, despite
obvious merit, lack that special magic,
including Richter's hair-raising Symphonic
Etudes, Horowitz's maniacal Third Sonata, and
Abbey Simon's Fantasy.
In the rather sparse notes to this CD one
discovers that Le Monde called Cynthia Raim “a
new Clara Haskil” in print. Now, I would
usually attribute this superlative to the
febrile mind of a mediocre critic. But Ms Raim
did win first prize in the Clara Haskil
International Piano Competition, so it's
perhaps to be expected that a critic on a
deadline might leap to that pithy, if somewhat
meaningless, conclusion. Le Monde's
declaration did, however, serve at least one
purpose: I have the highest regard for Clara
Haskil's musicianship, so Le Monde got me
interested in listening carefully to Mr Raim's
performance. And I've been doing just that –
interspersed with occasional Beethoven
quartets and the odd piano sonata – for months
now.
Music on the page is an approximation, capable
of multiple interpretations, multiple
“meanings” as it were, it is much roomier and
more dimensional than spoken language. It
follows that more than one of these “meanings”
can be aesthetically valid. Which is where
musicianship comes in. And one really gets a
sense of Ms Raim's deep understanding of
Schumann's musical language; her playing
speaks with absolute conviction, she both
cherishes and honors this music. And it is
music of fragile beauty, full of longing and
frantic nobility, dramatic and personal but
rarely indulgent. No, it does not have to be
played this way, but I am so grateful that it
is. The feeling has persisted these several
months that Ms Raim is revealing the core of
Schumann. This recording presents an
untrammeled doorway to Schumann's mind and
heart, allowing the spontaneous energy of a
truly unique – and perhaps undervalued - voice
to emerge with the inevitability of genius,
his and hers.
I have long attributed to women keyboardists a
special sensitivity, a special relationship to
music and to the means of producing it. (There
has been no one to equal Landowska's Bach.) At
the risk of committing a generalization, I
suspect this has something to do with a basic
orientation to life, to the importance given
to feelings, to emotional honesty and
openness. All the technique in the world is
nothing to me if it lacks heart. And the
pianoforte is not, for Ms Raim, an insensate
means of achieving an end, but a living
partner in the production of beautiful music.
Her playing is not just emotionally honest,
but emotionally spot on accurate.
Schumann's early solo piano music is not only
readily accessible, but nowhere else does he
seem quite as sure of his footing and quite as
spontaneous and brilliant. These “little”
compositions invite being called masterpieces.
One of my very favorites is Kreisleriana,
which Schumann composed in only four days (!).
It seems to me a perfectly executed
composition, its eight “Phantasien” span a
wide range of emotions. There isn't a
superfluous note or a false step throughout
the thirty-two minutes and twenty-eight
seconds of its execution. Although Schumann
dedicated the work to Chopin, it is yet
another testament to his love for Clara Wieck.
(We have Schumann's letters to Clara as
testimony. And seven of the eight pieces
incorporate a theme written by Clara.) And our
attention is inevitably drawn to Schumann's
dualistic view of his own persona, which he
named Florestan and Eusebius, representing its
wild, passionate, and its dreamy,
introspective sides respectively. In our
holistic age (which regards Descartes as
having gotten it wrong), this anachronism may
seem distinctly odd, if not proleptic of the
insanity which was to later overtake Schumann.
The name Kreisleriana derives from a fictional
character created by E.T.A. Hoffman, a musical
genius troubled by over sensitivity. Schumann
wrote that only German readers would
understand the connection. But we cannot
perhaps fail to draw a connection, even if we
don't read German, between one troubled genius
and another. Be that as it may, this music,
the panoply of emotion, is rendered
effortlessly by Cynthia Raim's unobtrusive,
masterful technique.

|