|
LessLoss Dynamic Filtering Power Cables
|
| The
Real Deal AC Cords |
| |
|
August 2008 |

I am definitely not the ideal candidate to
review a piece of wire, be it cable or AC
cord. Or perhaps in a certain sense I am:
You'd be hard pressed to find an audiophile
more skeptical of manufacturer claims,
golden eared perceptions, or the crypto-
(not to say pseudo-) science that has
peppered the literature on interconnects and
power cords for the last couple of decades
or so. Once upon a time, wire was just wire,
it was scarcely given a thought. And if it
was, the only parameters that were of any
concern were LRC: inductance, resistance,
capacitance.
When I agreed to audition the LessLoss
Dynamic Filtering AC Power Cord , I
admit I did not expect to be writing a
review. I anticipated hooking them up,
hearing no difference, and sending them back
with a courteous thank you note. I'd had
some truck with audio cables before (though
with AC power cords only once, briefly).
Years ago I traded a drawing to George
Cardas for a pair of interconnects and a
digital cable. I ultimately purchased
interconnects and speaker cable from Nordost
on the theory that LRC are all that really
matters. I was once given an audition of
PranaWire, interconnects and power cords, by
the designer/manufacturer. I do not say
these cables produced no audible difference,
but a great deal of close attention on my
part was required, and perceived differences
were slight and invariably not quite a
matter of certainty. Nowadays, of course,
cables are part of the standard arsenal of
audio equipment, reviewed constantly using
the usual superlatives. Could thousands of
audiophiles be deluded? Well, I suppose it's
possible. Certainly there is ample precedent
for great masses of people being deluded
about one thing or another. (In this regard
it is telling that many audiophiles find
double-blind testing meaningless and
inappropriate.) I fear that cables, for me
in any event, remain a vexed subject. And
what sense would there be in spending
thousands of dollars for wire, no matter how
beautifully made or well reviewed, if it
makes no audible difference? To me.
Proprietary interconnect cables made some
sense in theory at least; after all, they
were carrying minute, delicate signals, and
inductance, capacitance, resistance,
propagation speed, dielectric, metallurgy,
shielding, outer cover etc., were
potentially significant considerations.
Whereas AC power cord s had simply to
handle a fixed voltage (more or less) at a
fixed frequency, and to supply current as it
was instantaneously required. Hadn't they? I
never saw much sense in expensive two-meter
lengths of proprietary AC cordage, as if
this could somehow compensate for the
hundreds, even thousands of miles of
aluminum and copper - a gigantic RF antenna
system - bringing power to our doorstep.
Filtering and regenerating devices, perhaps.
AC power cords, no.
But when I installed a pair of LessLoss
Dynamic Filtering AC Power Cords (DFPCs) to
my monoblock Bel Canto REF1000s, I
immediately heard a stunning difference.
What I had considered impossible suddenly
was not only possible, but perfectly
obvious. If I'd installed a new
multi-thousand dollar DAC or amplifier and
heard this level of improvement, I'd
consider it well worth the money. What I
mean is, there were major
improvements, in clarity and detail and
dynamic range, in, above all, that elusive
quality called presence. A couple of weeks
later I installed a third LessLoss cord,
this one to my Bel Canto DAC3. Immediately I
noticed an unambiguous improvement, not to
the degree wrought by installing the DFPCs
to the monoblocks, but still unmistakable:
almost as if cotton balls had been removed
from my ears. I do not exaggerate. A better
pair of ears than mine were present for this
test, and her comment was that going back to
the OEM cord was like hearing the piano
under water.
These three lengths of wire have
improved the sound of this stereo to a
remarkable degree.
But AC power cords? Well, I am prepared to
believe my own ears. Particularly if
squinting of the eyes and straining of the
auditory faculties are not called for to
ferret out a perceptible difference in
sound. Now, as a long time 'non-believer' I
have no experience or knowledge of how other
AC power cord configurations might effect
the sound (or not), but there is quite
definitely something going on in these AC
power cords, and I strongly suspect it is
the (proprietary) filtering ability
of the wire that works much of the magic. (LessLoss
is not widely reviewed yet, but those
reviews I've read, by audiophiles who have
experienced numerous AC power cord s
over the years, consistently aver the
LessLoss DFPC is better than anything even
remotely in its price range.)
The idea an AC power cord could make a
difference to the sound reminded me of
something Ivor Tiefenbraun never tired of
saying: that the most critical component in
a sound system was the source (he was
referring to the Linn turntable, of course).
Precisely: in the same sense, the quality of
the AC power will color everything down
stream to some degree, preamps, amps,
digital converters, everything.
When my house was built, electrical codes
were different. So I am grateful to have
even a single outlet in the
living/music room with a real ground.
Unfortunately, it was necessary to place my
equipment rack at the other end of the room.
Plugged into the grounded outlet is a surge
protector (ZeroSurge 2R15). Plugged into the
surge protector is a 20 foot length of
shielded, 20A power cord. Plugged into that
is a C.E.A. high isolation transformer
(2000VA, 0.001pF coupling capacitance). And,
finally, plugged into that is a
commercial-grade power strip into which I
plug my equipment.
The LessLoss site has a lot of information
about the theory and construction of these
cords, and Liudas Motekaitis (who also uses
the anglicized version, Louis Motek),
LessLoss's designer/engineer, was kind
enough to provide additional material. As it
happens, LessLoss are developing a totally
nontraditional power filtering device, the
Firewall, that employs no active
components, no transformer or inductors or
capacitors because in the course of
developing their AC power cord s, they
found that removing the (traditional) power
filter from the circuit significantly
improved the sound. They attributed this
improvement to the elimination of the
inductance and capacitance contained in the
power filter, which tend to limit
instantaneous current. Considering my own
enlightening experience with these cords, it
is both interesting and reassuring that
LessLoss place so much importance on the
quality of power delivered to audio (and
video) equipment:
“I am convinced,” Mr Motek writes, “that
these somewhat 'boring' type of experiments
[with AC power delivery] can mean much more
to a system's overall performance and sound
quality than switching components or signal
cables, or even in some circumstances,
speakers!”
Now, a high isolation transformer (HIT) such
as mine filters the AC to some extent; when
I first installed it years ago, I recall
that it made the background quieter, or
“blacker,” as they say. But Mr Motek
suggested I experiment bypassing the HIT,
relying on the DFPCs to do the filtering, to
determine if eliminating this forty-two
pound, unshielded inductor would improve the
sound perceptibly. (Eliminating the HIT
would also provide a ground connection.) I
have to admit that I did anticipate
this move would make an audible difference.
And I believe it did (though not to the
degree installing any of the DFPCs did).
After all, it is logical that the hysteresis
inherent in any transformer will tend to
limit dynamics; just as it is reasonable
that an unshielded inductor of high value
will pick up every bit of EMI that passes
its way. Nor did I notice any loss in
background blackness without the HIT. And it
remains out of circuit.


|